[quote]On 17-10-06 05:58 Roving1 wrote:
Pot is for losers. One more good example. [/quote]
lol ok pencildick
violencejack
2 years ago
LMFAO SHIIIIIT MAN THAT WAS FUUUNY AS FUUUUCK LMAO MAN
AINT SEEN HIS SHIT IN A WHILE. MAKES ME WANNA SMOKE
MORE WEED (j)(j)(j)(j)(j)(j)(j)(j)
Fascismo
2 years ago
What is with this amazment with drug humor?:(
ahomelessman
2 years ago
[quote]On 17-10-06 05:50 The_Devil wrote:
reefer addicts kill babies and speed on the
highway.[/quote]
I kill up to 300 babies a day and then i eat their
souls
Roving1
2 years ago
They are amazed because it takes very little to impress
the q brain dead pot head moron.
mushieman014
2 years ago
Roving1 gets doped up on religious rhetoric instead. I
can't wait till that bitch goes to fight in Iraq so he
can spawn a whole new generation of terrorists.
Hopefully they'll kill hom over there before taking the
fight over here.
Roving1
2 years ago
[quote]On 18-10-06 20:38 mushieman014 wrote:
Roving1 gets doped up on religious rhetoric instead. I
can't wait till that bitch goes to fight in Iraq so he
can spawn a whole new generation of terrorists.
Hopefully they'll kill hom over there before taking the
fight over here.[/quote]
As usual the brain dead around us talk utter crap and
see things that are not there... religious rhetoric? I
see no where this religious rhetoric is refered to. One
too many puffs me thinks..Living proof folks..
And please don`t lump me in with the yanks you stupid
wanker. But that is a good idea in a way. We should
send over any pot addicts or people who toke up to be
killed then there is no really lose of life that needs
to be cared about.
CANADIANDUDE
2 years ago
[quote]On 18-10-06 21:23 Roving1 wrote:
[..]
As usual the brain dead around us talk utter crap and
see things that are not there... religious rhetoric? I
see no where this religious rhetoric is refered to. One
too many puffs me thinks..Living proof folks..
And please don`t lump me in with the yanks you stupid
wanker. But that is a good idea in a way. We should
send over any pot addicts or people who toke up to be
killed then there is no really lose of life that needs
to be cared about.
[/quote]
Eh , reply if you have the balls to debate what you say
is true......
mushieman014
2 years ago
If you want to discuss some neuropharmacology with me
go ahead, but I would have no reason to believe you
would understand. THC and other cannibinols/
cannibinoids exhibit very little degree of
neurotoxicity, or any for that matter. It is possible
that, after ingesting the compounds present in
cannabis, or any related CA1 agonist for that matter,
in a volumptuous manner for a period of 7 to 10 years
that a neurotoxic effect may develop. However, it is
likely that this effect would only be temporary as your
brain is very resilient to damage and can repair itself
through the process of neurogenesis. Through the action
of G-protein linked pathways, CA1 agonists, agonists of
this particular cannibinoid receptor, actually
stimulate neurogenesis (the process of stem cells and
glia from your dentate gyrus forming into neurons and
moving to other parts of your brain). THC and
cannibinoids actually prevent the accumulation of
amygloid plaques in your brain . These plaques are
associated with the onset of the disease known as
Alzheimers. THC promotes the presence and continued
porduction of the anzymes that break these plaques
down, as well as interacting with it directly to break
them down through chemical processes which we do not
fully comprehend. However, THC and cannibinoids are
known to also produce changes to the hippocampus, the
area of the brain that controls primarily memory and
learning, by altering dendrite-axon connections. It is
not fully understood, however, what the effects of this
dendrite-axon rewiring are. It is rather minimal,
however, considering the natural process of
neurogenesis causes the formation of thousands of new
neurons each day, especially in the hippocampal region.
The LD50 for THC and the ingestion of cannabis is
fairly high, something along the lines of 200mg/ kg for
humans when smoked. THC can not produce cancerous
effects as THC stops cancerous cells from thier
uncontrolled division cycle known as metastasis.
If you have any informatio
CANADIANDUDE
2 years ago
God bless.....weed.....(j)
MrFreeze
2 years ago
[quote]On 19-10-06 19:12 mushieman014 wrote:
If you want to discuss some neuropharmacology with me
go ahead, but I would have no reason to believe you
would understand. THC and other cannibinols/
cannibinoids exhibit very little degree of
neurotoxicity, or any for that matter. It is possible
that, after ingesting the compounds present in
cannabis, or any related CA1 agonist for that matter,
in a volumptuous manner for a period of 7 to 10 years
that a neurotoxic effect may develop. However, it is
likely that this effect would only be temporary as your
brain is very resilient to damage and can repair itself
through the process of neurogenesis. Through the action
of G-protein linked pathways, CA1 agonists, agonists of
this particular cannibinoid receptor, actually
stimulate neurogenesis (the process of stem cells and
glia from your dentate gyrus forming into neurons and
moving to other parts of your brain). THC and
cannibinoids actually prevent the accumulation of
amygloid plaques in your brain . These plaques are
associated with the onset of the disease known as
Alzheimers. THC promotes the presence and continued
porduction of the anzymes that break these plaques
down, as well as interacting with it directly to break
them down through chemical processes which we do not
fully comprehend. However, THC and cannibinoids are
known to also produce changes to the hippocampus, the
area of the brain that controls primarily memory and
learning, by altering dendrite-axon connections. It is
not fully understood, however, what the effects of this
dendrite-axon rewiring are. It is rather minimal,
however, considering the natural process of
neurogenesis causes the formation of thousands of new
neurons each day, especially in the hippocampal region.
The LD50 for THC and the ingestion of cannabis is
fairly high, something along the lines of 200mg/ kg for
humans when smoked. THC can not produce cancerous
effects as THC stops cancerous cells from thier
uncontrolled division cycle known
Roving1
2 years ago
[quote]On 19-10-06 19:12 mushieman014 wrote:
If you want to discuss some neuropharmacology with me
go ahead, but I would have no reason to believe you
would understand. THC and other cannibinols/
cannibinoids exhibit very little degree of
neurotoxicity, or any for that matter. It is possible
that, after ingesting the compounds present in
cannabis, or any related CA1 agonist for that matter,
in a volumptuous manner for a period of 7 to 10 years
that a neurotoxic effect may develop. However, it is
likely that this effect would only be temporary as your
brain is very resilient to damage and can repair itself
through the process of neurogenesis. Through the action
of G-protein linked pathways, CA1 agonists, agonists of
this particular cannibinoid receptor, actually
stimulate neurogenesis (the process of stem cells and
glia from your dentate gyrus forming into neurons and
moving to other parts of your brain). THC and
cannibinoids actually prevent the accumulation of
amygloid plaques in your brain . These plaques are
associated with the onset of the disease known as
Alzheimers. THC promotes the presence and continued
porduction of the anzymes that break these plaques
down, as well as interacting with it directly to break
them down through chemical processes which we do not
fully comprehend. However, THC and cannibinoids are
known to also produce changes to the hippocampus, the
area of the brain that controls primarily memory and
learning, by altering dendrite-axon connections. It is
not fully understood, however, what the effects of this
dendrite-axon rewiring are. It is rather minimal,
however, considering the natural process of
neurogenesis causes the formation of thousands of new
neurons each day, especially in the hippocampal region.
The LD50 for THC and the ingestion of cannabis is
fairly high, something along the lines of 200mg/ kg for
humans when smoked. THC can not produce cancerous
effects as THC stops cancerous cells from thier
uncontrolled division cycle known
mushieman014
2 years ago
Your lack of verbal ingenuity perhaps either reflects
your age or some lack of intelligence on your part. I
did not copy and paste, I summarized from knowledge
attained from research. If the only counter argument
you can give is some character insult regarding my
sources, I really can present nothing that might
deflate your ignorance and conceit. I can give you
links to various neuroscience papers if you would like
though.
Additional information that is quite relavant is that a
heavy dose of smoked THC would be around 2mg for a full
grown adult. The LD50 is at leats 200mg/kg. Some simple
math and you would realize you would have to smoke
quite a lot of cannabis to die.
Why don't you use your roving talents to transfer your
vacuous absence of wit and intelligence to somewhere it
might not inflict or inconvenience other people.
Another note is that, eventhough smoking cannabis
cannot cause lung cancer, it can cause other smoking
related problems such as shortness of breath and
emphysema.
CANADIANDUDE
2 years ago
[quote]On 19-10-06 21:34 Roving1 wrote:
[..]
Wow you can copy off a source on the net I am proud of
you...But I guess you are a little confused. I was
asking about all this religious rhetoric you accused me
of..
As for you little blurb of how safe pot is. Seen it.
Please refer to this very comment in the report...
THC and cannibinoids are known to also produce changes
to the hippocampus, the area of the brain that controls
primarily memory and learning, by altering
dendrite-axon connections. It is not fully understood,
however, what the effects of this dendrite-axon
rewiring are.
Boy that sounds so safe for one to use...
Did you even read the whole report or did you just copy
and paste?
[/quote]
We all get it , you hate pot smokers now fuck
off you dirty lil' crackhead